Ethereum (ETH) ETFs Don’t Perform at All
While spot Bitcoin ETFs experienced a strong net inflow of $108 million, topped by BlackRock’s IBIT ETF with $80.96 million, Ethereum ETFs saw no change at all. All nine spot Ethereum ETFs recorded negative net flows despite market volatility, suggesting a lack of investor trust or activity. The activity of Ethereum ETFs and Bitcoin ETFs does not differ more significantly.
Ethereum (ETH) is still being disregarded despite the market’s beginning to rebound since businesses such as Fidelity VanEck and Grayscale are seeing continuous capital movement in Bitcoin-related products. This stagnation indicates that the asset’s narrative is currently not very appealing to institutions, despite Ethereum having long held the position of second-largest cryptocurrency.
Ethereum’s price chart indicates that the current situation is similar to the ETF’s lack of activity. ETH continues to trade in a tight falling wedge to provide short-term stability near the $1,580 level. It hasn’t, however, shown any significant breakout potential. The asset remains considerably below the 50, 100, and 200 EMA levels ($1,800, $2,267, and $2,568, respectively), indicating a persistently strong bearish trend.
The volume has also been steadily dropping, which suggests that institutional and retail investors are less driven or interested. Without generating a genuine reversal signal, the RSI indicates that Ethereum ETH is still trading near oversold zone, and weak bullish attempts are frequently turned down.
Since there are no inflows into Ethereum ETH ETFs and no observable buying pressure on the spot market, Ethereum is effectively stalling while Bitcoin takes all the capital attention. Unless a major fundamental event, like the legalization of ETF staking or a positive regulatory shift, happens soon, ETH may continue to lag.
Disclaimer and Risk Warning
coinweck does not endorse or is responsible for any content, accuracy, quality, advertising, products, or other materials on this page. The image used in this article is for informational purposes only and is provided to us by a third party. coinweck should not be held responsible for image copyright issues. Contact us if you have any issues or concerns. Readers should do their research before taking any actions related to the company.